I have not time to review fallacies perfectly. Even now, however, I cannot make sense of Hasty generalization, Post hoc and Begging the question. I assumed that I could understand all of the general concepts.
Hasty generalization means that it has no sufficient evidence and always includes one's bias, stereotype and experiences.
Post hoc means that sentences that seem related as cause and event are not really related, so it is not logical.
Begging the question means that it hides assumption, so there is no main point in the essay.
Am I OK??????
If I am wrong, please comment, please!!!